大罗-PHP/Python博客

1)
When working with strings and you need to check that the string is
either of a certain length you'd understandably would want to use the
strlen() function. This function is pretty quick since it's operation
does not perform any calculation but merely return the already known
length of a string available in the zval structure (internal C struct
used to store variables in PHP). However because strlen() is a function
it is still somewhat slow because the function call requires several
operations such as lowercase & hashtable lookup followed by the
execution of said function. In some instance you can improve the speed
of your code by using a isset() trick.



Ex.

if (strlen($foo) < 5) { echo "Foo is too short"; }

vs.

if (!isset($foo{5})) { echo "Foo is too short"; }



Calling isset() happens to be faster then strlen() because unlike
strlen(), isset() is a language construct and not a function meaning
that it's execution does not require function lookups and lowercase.
This means you have virtually no overhead on top of the actual code
that determines the string's length.



2) When incrementing or decrementing the value of the variable $i++
happens to be a tad slower than ++$i. This is something PHP specific
and does not apply to other languages, so don't go modifying your C or
Java code thinking it'll suddenly become faster, it won't. ++$i happens
to be faster in PHP because instead of 4 opcodes used for $i++ you only
need 3. Post incrementation actually causes in the creation of a
temporary var that is then incremented. While pre-incrementation
increases the original value directly. This is one of the optimization
that opcode optimized like Zend's PHP optimizer. It is a still a good
idea to keep in mind since not all opcode optimizers perform this
optimization and there are plenty of ISPs and servers running without
an opcode optimizer.



3) When it comes to printing text to screen PHP has so many
methodologies to do it, not many users even know all of them. This
tends to result in people using output methods they are already
familiar from other languages. While this is certainly an
understandable approach it is often not best one as far as performance
in concerned.



print vs echo



Even both of these output mechanism are language constructs, if you
benchmark the two you will quickly discover that print() is slower than
echo(). The reason for that is quite simple, print function will return
a status indicating if it was successful or not, while echo simply
print the text and nothing more. Since in most cases (haven't seen one
yet) this status is not necessary and is almost never used it is
pointless and simply adds unnecessary overhead.



printf



Using printf() is slow for multitude of reasons and I would strongly
discourage it's usage unless you absolutely need to use the
functionality this function offers. Unlike print and echo printf() is a
function with associated function execution overhead. More over
printf() is designed to support various formatting schemes that for the
most part are not needed in a language that is typeless and will
automatically do the necessary type conversions. To handle formatting
printf() needs to scan the specified string for special formatting code
that are to be replaced with variables. As you can probably imagine
that is quite slow and rather inefficient.



heredoc



This output method comes to PHP from PERL and like most features
adopted from other languages it's not very friendly as far as
performance is concerned. While this method allows you to easily output
large chunks of text while preserving things like newlines and even
allow for variable handling inside the text block this is quite slow
and there are better ways to do that. Performance wise this is just
marginally faster then printf() however it does not offer nearly as
much functionality.



?><?


When you need to output a large or even a medium sized static bit of
text it is faster and simpler to put it outside the of PHP. This will
make the PHP's parser effectively skipover this bit of text and output
it as is without any overhead. You should be careful however and not
use this for many small strings in between PHP code as multiple context
switches between PHP and plain text will ebb away at the performance
gained by not having PHP print the text via one of it's functions or
constructs.



4) Many scripts tend to reply on regular expression to validate the
input specified by user. While validating input is a superb idea, doing
so via regular expression can be quite slow. In many cases the process
of validation merely involved checking the source string against a
certain character list such as A-Z or 0-9, etc... Instead of using
regex in many instances you can instead use the ctype
extension (enabled by default since PHP 4.2.0) to do the same. The
ctype extension offers a series of function wrappers around C's is*()
function that check whether a particular character is within a certain
range. Unlike the C function that can only work a character at a time,
PHP function can operate on entire strings and are far faster then
equivalent regular expressions.

Ex.

preg_match("![0-9]+!", $foo);

vs

ctype_digit($foo);



5) Another common operation in PHP scripts is array searching. This
process can be quite slow as regular search mechanism such as
in_array() or manuall implementation work by itterating through the
entire array. This can be quite a performance hit if you are searching
through a large array or need to perform the searches frequently. So
what can you do? Well, you can do a trick that relies upon the way that
Zend Engine stores array data. Internally arrays are stored inside hash
tables when they array element (key) is the key of the hashtables used
to find the data and result is the value associated with that key.
Since hashtable lookups are quite fast, you can simplify array
searching by making the data you intend to search through the key of
the array, then searching for the data is as simple as $value =
isset($foo[$bar])) ? $foo[$bar] : NULL;. This searching mechanism is
way faster then manual array iteration, even though having string keys
maybe more memory intensive then using simple numeric keys.



Ex.



$keys = array("apples", "oranges", "mangoes", "tomatoes", "pickles");

if (in_array('mangoes', $keys)) { ... }



vs



$keys = array("apples" => 1, "oranges" => 1, "mangoes" => 1, "tomatoes" => 1, "pickles" => 1);

if (isset($keys['mangoes'])) { ... }



The bottom search mechanism is roughly 3 times faster.



If you know or have any additional optimization tricks let me know .